Article abstract << publications :: home  

Title: Vascular disease in women: comparison of diagnoses in hospital episode statistics and general practice records in England

Authors: F.L. Wright, J. Green, D. Canoy, B.J. Cairns, A. Balkwill and V. Beral for the Million Women Study Collaborators.

Reference: BMC Medical Research Methodology 12:161.

Full text: [Full text :: OPEN ACCESS]


Abstract:

Background. Electronic linkage to routine administrative datasets, such as the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England, is increasingly used in medical research. Relatively little is known about the reliability of HES diagnostic information for epidemiological studies. In the United Kingdom (UK), general practitioners hold comprehensive records for individuals relating to their primary, secondary and tertiary care. For a random sample of participants in a large UK cohort, we compared vascular disease diagnoses in HES and general practice records to assess agreement between the two sources.

Methods. Million Women Study participants with a HES record of hospital admission with vascular disease (ischaemic heart disease [ICD-10 codes I20-I25], cerebrovascular disease [G45, I60-I69] or venous thromboembolism [I26, I80-I82]) between April 1st 1997 and March 31st 2005 were identified. In each broad diagnostic group, and in women with no such HES diagnoses, a random sample of about a thousand women was selected for study. We asked each woman's general practitioner to provide information on her history of vascular disease and this information was compared with the HES diagnosis record.

Results. Over 90% of study forms sent to general practitioners were returned and 88% of these contained analysable data. For the vast majority of study participants for whom information was available, diagnostic information from general practice and HES records was consistent. Overall, for 93% of women with a HES diagnosis of vascular disease, general practice records agreed with the HES diagnosis; and for 97% of women with no HES diagnosis of vascular disease, the general practitioner had no record of a diagnosis of vascular disease. For severe vascular disease, including myocardial infarction (I21-22), stroke, both overall (I60-64) and by subtype, and pulmonary embolus (I26), HES records appeared to be both reliable and complete.

Conclusions. Hospital admission data in England provide diagnostic information for vascular disease of sufficient reliability for epidemiological analyses.

Acknowledgement. We thank all the women who participated in the study, the general practitioners who completed the study forms, staff from the NHS Breast Screening Centres and the Cancer Epidemiology Unit. We also thank the Information Centre for Health and Social Care for the hospital admission data.


© 2002-2010 Benjamin J. Cairns: e-mail ; ph +44 1865 289673 ;
Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7LF, U.K.