Appendix 2: A TEI conformant tagset for manuscript description
This appendix provides a more detailed description of the TEI
extensions already introduced in section above.
It is, of necessity, more technical than this earlier discussion, and
assumes a more detailed knowledge of the TEI scheme and of the syntax of
SGML on the part of the reader. In particular, it omits any discussion
or explanation of SGML and of the particular element definitions which
currently constitute the TEI Recommendations. (A good
introductory collection of papers on the TEI is provided by
Ide and Veronis (1996), and up to date
information is available from the TEI's web site at http://www-tei.uic.edu/orgs/tei/)
Basic principles
The goal of this scheme is to provide a framework which the
cataloguer can use to model the structure of a manuscript. Unlike, for
example, the Encoded Archival Description, which models the finding aid
for a manuscript, but not the manuscript itself, our DTD is intended to
facilitate the production of an SGML document within which either a full
transcription or a set of page images of a manuscript can be embedded,
or with which such things can readily be linked. The manuscript
description (as opposed to the manuscript) must therefore be treated as
metadata.
A further assumption underlying our proposals is that we should
depart from the proposals of the TEI only where these are demonstrably
inadequate to our needs. In practice, we rely heavily on the basic
structure and content of the
TEI Guidelines (Sperberg-McQueen and Burnard 1994) for the bulk of
our encoding scheme. This has two implications: firstly, our manuscript
description is located firmly within the existing metadata framework
provided by the TEI's header; secondly, we do not here describe in any
detail those parts of the TEI scheme which we use unchanged.
The TEI requires that metadata be encoded within a special element
called the TEI Header (documented in chapter 5 of TEI P3). For documents
which consist only of metadata (such as collections of manuscript
descriptions), two mechanisms are possible: either a free standing DTD
known as the Independent Header (see chapter 24 of P3) may be used, or
each set of metadata may be embedded within the standard TEI biblFull
element, which can then be used within the body of a text in the same
way as the other bibliographic elements defined in the TEI scheme.
The TEI system includes a modification mechanism, which has been
followed in defining the encoding scheme described here. This scheme
assumes that the TEI's base tagset for prose, together with the
additional tagsets for figures and for linking are in use. A TEI
conformant document using this system will therefore begin with a set of
declarations like the following:
] >
]]>
These declarations associate the system files wmss.dtd
and wmss.ent with the parameter entities
TEI.extensions.dtd and TEI.extensions.ent
respectively, as further discussed in chapter 4 of TEI P3. The
following kinds of modification are accomplished by these declarations:definition of the mssStmt element: an additional,
richly detailed, component within the standard TEI Header (see section
)definition of an additional global attribute called range,
used to specify the location of any part of a manuscript description, in
terms of a single consistent foliation (see section
)definition of a chunk-level surrogate or summary
element (see section )definition of some specialized phrase-level heading elements
(see section ) At present, we have
found no need to remove any of the element definitions included in the
TEI prose base extended by the additional tagsets for linking and
images.
The Manuscript Statement
The manuscript statement is embedded as a further alternative
component of the sourceDesc element, within an otherwise
unmodified teiHeader element. The mssStmt element
(by analogy with recordingStmt) contains a full description
of a manuscript, that is, any object bearing handwriting or
inscription. A description should be distinguished from a transcription
or an edition: although it may mimic the structure of the object
described, and may thus serve as a skeleton for the construction of a
transcription or a set of images of a manuscript, a description remains
a bibliographic substitute for an object, and as such belongs within the
TEI Header.
Since manuscripts in major collections are often composed of several
originally quite distinct physical components, the mssStmt
element may contain a number of distinct descriptions for component
parts, as an alternative, or in addition, to the description of the
whole manuscript. A distinct mssStmt element should be used
for each such component part, and embedded within that for the
manuscript as a whole. For example, the mssStmt for a codex
made up of three medieval manuscripts of different date which have
subsequently been bound together, would contain a series of elements
describing the whole codex, and three embedded mssStmt
elements, each of which describes features of its components.
Nested manuscript descriptions do not need to repeat elements which
have already been specified by their parent. For example, if the leaves
element at the outermost level of a mssStmt specifies that a
codex contains parchment leaves, it is assumed that all of its
components are parchment, unless a further leaves element
appears within a nested mssStmt.
groups elements describing the physical, decorative, and other
features of a manuscript or manuscript-part. It carries an additional
attribute:specifies the format of the manuscript or manuscript part being
described. Legal values are defined by the formatTypes
parameter entity, for the Bodleian application defaulting to:description relates to a complete codex.description relates to a roll.description relates to a single leaf.description relates to a leaf-fragment.description relates to an incomplete codex.description relates to a leaf-fragment deliberately excised.
The components of the mssStmt element are listed below.
The same component elements are used, whether the description relates to
a whole manuscript or a part. If a given element appears both for a part
and for a whole, information at the part level is understood to
complement or over-ride information at the whole. If no information of a
given kind is present at the part level, information of the same kind
specified within its immediate parent mssStmt is applicable.
The following elements may appear within a mssStmt
element, relating either to the whole of a manuscript, or to some
distinct part within it.
groups elements describing decorative aspects of a manuscript or
manuscript part.defines a set of measured dimensions within a manuscript or
manuscript part.
describes the physical make-up of a manuscript or manuscript part,
specifically, the leaves of which it is composed, the material of which
these are composed, and any damage.describes one or more numbering systems used to refer to
individual parts of a manuscript or manuscript part, typically based on
its foliation or pagination.
contains a formula describing the single leaves, bifolia, and quires (or
gatherings) of which a manuscript or manuscript part is
composed.
contains one or more scriptNote elements, describing
the script or writing system used in a manuscript or manuscript part.contains a description of the rubrication applied
to a manuscript or manuscript part, i.e. the use of red ink or other
mechanisms to indicate headings, etc.
supplies a kind of fingerprint (secundo
folio) used to identify a given manuscript or manuscript part.contains a description of some stage in a manuscript's ownership
or history.contains an ordered sequence of provenance elements.contains information relating to the present or former binding of
a manuscript or manuscript part.
The decoration element is used to group together
information relating to decorative aspects (e.g. historiated or
decorated initials, miniatures, borders etc.) of a manuscript or
manuscript part. Its components and usage are discussed in section
. More than one such element may be provided for
a given manuscript or manuscript part, in a case where there distinct
decorative campaigns have been identified.
Each of the possibly many dim elements within a manuscript
description defines a set of measurements for one or more of its
leaves, as further discussed in section .
The optional leaves, foliation, and collation
elements and their components are further discussed in section
below. The
scriptDesc, rubrication, and secFol
elements and their components are further discussed in section
. The provenance and listProvenance
element are further discussed in section below.
The binding element is further discussed below in section
.
The mssStmtelement is formally defined as follows:
]]>
Decoration
The following elements are available within the decoration
element. Any or all of them may be used to provide detailed information
about particular decorative aspects of the manuscript or manuscript
part.contains a summary overview of the decorative scheme, typically
including the total number of miniatures of different sizes, an
indication of any missing or excised decoration, and other descriptive
comments.describes any independant (free-standing) illustrations.(i.e. historiated initials) describes initials which depict
scenes or events, or contain persons or animals (even if they are
unidentified), whose representational function can be considered
narrative, or at least more than purely decorative.
(i.e. decorated initials) describes initials which are decorated
in a non-narrative way.
describes decoration occupying one or more margins of the page,
which is neither dependent on an initial for its structure or shape, nor
a discreet miniature, as defined above.
describes any minor decoration not covered by the elements above.
Contains commentary on the decoration, such as an attribution to
a named artist, or discussion of the evidence for excised decoration.
All of these elements have the same sub-components: a sequence of
one or more paragraphs, tagged using the TEI p element. Here
is an example of the use of the overview element:
The decoration comprises two
full page miniatures, perhaps added by the original
owner, or slightly later; the original major decoration
consists of twenty-three large miniatures, illustrating
the divisions of the Passion narrative and the start of
the major texts, and the major divisions of the Hours;
seventeen smaller miniatures, illustrating the suffrages
to saints; and seven historiated initials, illustrating
the pericopes and major prayers.]]>
In a manuscript with little decorative material, an overview of the
above kind may be all that is needed. Often however the cataloguer may
wish to describe the decoration in greater detail, using the appropriate
sub-elements defined above. Whichever of these sub-elements of decoration
are used, features will most naturally be described in the order of a
descending hierarchy, based on such aspects as size, complexity,
colour, or materials.
Such hierarchies may conveniently be represented using the standard
TEI list element, embedded within a paragraph. The range
attribute (discussed in section
below) may be used to link each component item
to the folio on which it appears. The iconTerm element
discussed in section below may be used to
identify particular scenes, events, persons, animals, and objects
represented, as in the following example:
Fourteen large miniatures with arched
tops, above five lines of text:
Pericopes. St. John writing on
Patmos, with the Eagle holding his ink-pot and pen-case;
some flaking of pigment, especially in the skyHours of the Virgin, Matins.
Annunciation; Gabriel and the Dove to the
rightPrime. Nativity; the
Virgin and Joseph adoring the ChildTerce. Annunciation to the
Shepherds, one with bagpipes
]]>
Historiated initials may be described in much the same way, using
the historInit element as follows:
Seven historiated
initials, six or seven lines high, illustrating pericopes and prayers:
Pericope of Luke. St. Luke writing,
the Ox beside himPericope of Matthew. St. Matthew
writing, the Angel holding a book openPericope of Mark. St. Mark writing
(left-handed), the Lion beside himObsecro te. The Virgin of the
Apocalypse, holding the Christ Child, standing on a
crescent moonO intemerata. The Virgin reading
a book, with St. Joseph(?)Stabat mater. Pietà, in
front of the CrossMissus est Gabriel.
The Annunciation
]]>.
The distinction between historiated and decorated initials is that
the former typically depict scenes, events, persons, or animals, whose
representational function can be considered to be more than purely
decorative, while the latter is for use where initials are decorated in
a non-narrative manner. In cases of uncertainty as to whether an image
was intended to have more than a purely decorative function, (for
example hybrid creatures, dragons, or other similar stock motifs), the
decorInit element should be preferred.
The following example describes a typical set of decorated (but not
historiated) initials:
Four- or three-line initials in blue and
red, enclosing foliage, on a gold ground, at the start of each text
with a large miniature; two-line initals in gold, on a blue and red
ground with white tracery, to psalms, capitula, lessons, etc. and the
KL monograms in the Calendar; similar one-line initials to verses and
other minor divisions.
]]>
An example of the use of the minorDec element follows.
Note that this element should not be used to document such decorative
aspects as the use of coloured ink for a paragraph mark, or a
calligraphic flourish of the pen as part of the handwriting, which
would be better described using the
rubrication and script elements, respectively.
Line fillers similar to one-line initials
except that line-fillers from fol.185r-193v are of a stylistically
later type than the rest, and use only painted gold, on
an alternately blue or red square ground.
]]>
Similar considerations apply to the use of the borderelement,
as in the following example:
The large miniatures and the Lauds initial
surrounded by four-sided framed borders of stylised foliage on a plain
parchment ground, and variously-shaped panels of naturalistic plants
on a painted gold ground; the small miniatures and five-line
historiated initials surrounded by similar three-sided borders (in the
outer margins); similar one-sided border panels on all pages with a
two-line initial
]]>
The following example demonstrates the use of a list of
distinct attributive commentaries relating to different parts of a
manuscript, on which at least four main artists have worked.
At least four main artists
worked on the book, the division of their work
corresponding to the sections written by the three main
scribes (see under Script): Most of the main body of the book (up to fol.182v) was
painted and decorated in one style, having links in style and
iconography with the school of Maître Francois, although several
of the miniatures in this section have been damaged and overpainted at
a later date (e.g. the figure of Christ on fol. 33r; the face of the
Shepherdess on fol. 59v, etc.).Within this first section, the miniature at the start of the
Hours of the Virgin (fol. 34v), is in another style, more suggestive
of the early 16th. cent. than the late 15th.The border on fol. 184r is of the same type as those which precede, but the
facing minature appears to be by a later, less able, artist, who was
perhaps also responsible for the coat of arms on fol.184v.Finally, the miniature on fol. 185r is by a hand working in the
style of Jean Bourdichon: his more sophisticated use of gold
highlights, his more subtle modelling, and his treatment of the
landscape and the framing architecture set him apart from the
miniatures which precede.
]]>
The decoration element and its components are defined as
follows:
]]>
Dimensions and areas
Manuscripts and manuscript parts may be measured in a number of
different ways, using different units. Each set of measurements given
for a particular part defines a distinct dim element, defined
using the following elements.defines a measured set of dimensions within a manuscript or
manuscript part. Attributes include:indicates the kind of area being defined. Legal values are
specified by the dimType parameter entity; for the
Bodleian application, proposed values are: dimensions relate to a single leaf. dimensions relate to a distinct group of leaves (e.g. a
gathering, or a separately bound part)dimensions relate to the area of a leaf which has been ruled in
preparation for writing. dimensions relate to the area of a leaf which has been pricked
out in preparation for ruling (used where this differs significantly
from the ruled area, or where the ruling is not measurable). dimensions relate to the area of a leaf which has been written,
with the height measured from the top of the minims on the top line of
writing, to the bottom of the minims on the bottom line of writing.
dimensions relate to the box or other container in which the
whole codex or manuscript is stored.
At its simplest, a dim element may contain only a brief
description, as in the following example:
Ruled in red ink for 18 lines of text per page
]]>More usually, however, the description will include measurements
of height, width, or depth, or all three, using the following
elements:specifies the dimension measured along the axis parallel to the
spine.specifies the dimension measured along the axis at right angles
to the spine. specifies the dimension measured along the axis perpendicular to
the spine.
For each of the above elements, the following attributes may be
supplied: specifies the units used for this measurement. The default, and
recommended, value is mm, i.e. millimetres.
specifies the applicability of this measurement to the containing
manuscript or manuscript part. Legal values are:measurement applies to all instances in this manuscript or
manuscript part.measurement applies to most instances in this manuscript or
manuscript part.all the instances measured in this manuscript or manuscript part
are within the range specified
The following example indicates that the leaves of this manuscript
range from 157 to 160 mm in height and are all 105 mm in width, while
the ruled area on most pages is approximately 90 x 48 mm.
157-1601059048
]]>
These elements are defined as follows:
]]>
Leaves, material, foliation, and collation
Manuscripts are composed of leaves or sheets of
materials such as paper or vellum, which are numbered or foliated
according to one or more schemes, and which are bound
together physically into one or more groups of gatherings or quires.
There are various ways of expressing the arrangement of these quires,
using numbers to represent each quire and the number of leaves of which
it ias composed: this expression of the structure is called the collation.
In this subsection we define elements which may be used to record
information about each of these aspects.
Leaves
groups information about the leaves or sheets of material used to form a
manuscript, whether or not intended as a surface for writing. Each leaf
has two sides (i.e. two pages), recto and verso.
A distinction is made between the body leaves of a manuscript, and
the fly leaves which may precede or follow them: a flyleaf
is here defined as any leaf which was originally left completely or
almost completely blank at the beginning or end of a manuscript,
regardless of whether it was subsequently used for writing or
decoration. The following elements are used to define them:
contains a description of the number and material of flyleaves of a
manuscript
contains a description of the number of leaves of the main, written,
part of a manuscript, which may contain blank leaves within it (these
are not flyleaves).
Attributes for both flyLeaves and bodyLeaves
elements include:
states the number of leaves
For example, a manuscript containing two fly leaves, followed by 40
body leaves, and two further fly leaves might be described as follows:
]]>
Alternatively, more information about the leaves making up the
manuscript might be supplied, using any of the following elements
repeated as often as necessary to describe the materials of which leaves
are composed, any watermarks associated with them, and any damage they
may have suffered:describes the material of which leaves are composed. Attributes
include:
supplies a normalized form of name for the kind of material used.
Legal values are defined by the materialTypes parameter
entity. For leaves, the following values are proposed:paper.parchment or vellum.other.unknown.describes any watermark present.
describes any damage to the leaves, such as water-staining, burning,
rodent damage, excised margins, etc.
A brief description only may be given, enclosed within a paragraph
tag, as in the flyleaves of the example below. More usually, at least a
materialelement will be used, as in the body leaves below:
modern paper, the first conjoint with the pastedown
Parchment, often with a marked
difference between hair and flesh sides, often with irregular edges,
arranged with the spine of the animal running
horizontally
modern paper, the second conjoint with the pastedown
]]> These elements are defined as follows
]]>
Foliation
The term foliation refers to the method used to
number the leaves of a manuscript, in order to give each one a unique
identifier. It is customary to use the same folio number for the front
and back side of a leaf, distinguishing the two by addition of the
words recto, for the front side, and verso
for the back side (usually abbreviated to r and
v respectively) should be specified. When front
and back sides of a leaf are given different numbers, the manuscript is
said to be paginated.
For descriptive purposes, it may be useful to record several
different sets of foliation or pagination for the same manuscript. One
of these must be used consistently as the reference foliation system
used by the range attribute discussed in section
describes one or more of the numbering systems (usually
foliation or pagination) applied to a manuscript. Attributes include Indicates whether this foliation is contemporary with the
manuscript's contents or not. Legal values areFoliation is originalFoliation is not originalDate of foliation is unknown
This element may simply contain a prose description enclosed in one
or more paragraphs, as in the following example:
Fols. 1-34 with near-contemporary(?) ink foliation
in Arabic numerals
the front flyleaf and the remaining folios with modern pencil i and
35-260
]]>
Alternatively, more specific detail may be given using one or more of
the following elements:describes the historical period during which the numbering system
was applied to a manuscript. describes the medium (for example, ink, pencil, pigment,
drypoint) by means of which the numbering system was applied to a
manuscript. describes the numbering system (for example, upper/lower-case
roman numerals, arabic numerals, etc.) which has been applied to a
manuscript.
These elements are defined as follows
]]>
Collation
The term collation is used to describe the manner in
which individual groups of leaves and bifolia are organised into quires
or gatherings, including details of the sequence and size
of these quires, and indications of added or missing leaves. The
collation is usually expressed as a formula.
The following elements are provided to record collation information:
describes the make-up of a manuscript, in terms of a quire formula,
defining its single leaves, bifolia, and quires, and the evidence
supporting the formula.
contains a quire formula, expressed as a group of consecutive
quireSequence elements, which is distinct in some significant
way from those that precede or follow itcontains a single quire, or a run of consecutive quires of the
same size.
For example, the following collation description indicates that
there are two distinct groups of gatherings, the first (corresponding
with the modern foliation 1 to 13) being composed of a single 12 leaf
gathering to which an additional leaf was added at the start; and the
second (corresponding with modern folios 14 to 26) being composed of
three gatherings, composed of six, four, and two leaves respectively.
1st leaf added, fol. 1
]]>
The quire at the start of a new quireGroup will normally
coincide with some new physical feature, scribe, artist, etc. There is
no requirement that all quires of the same size necessarily form a
single quireGroup.
The following example indicates that the flyleaves and pastedowns at
both the front and back of the volume are original; and that the main
body of the MS. consists of three discernable internal groupings, each
defined by the fact that textual and physical divisions of the volume
correspond with one another; the first of these occupies fols. 1-138,
and consists of 13 quires (quires I-XIII, fols. 1-130) each composed of
10 leaves, and one quire (quire XIV, fols. 131-138) of 8 leaves; the
second textual-structural unit occupies fols. 139-238, and consists 10
quires (quires XV-XXIV), of each of 10 leaves; the third
textual-structural unit occupies fols. 239-258, and consists of 2 quires
(quires XXV-XXVI) each of 10 leaves:
The written leaves preceded by an original flyleaf, conjoint
with the pastedown
fols. 259-60 are two further original flyleaves, conjoint with two
pasted-down leaves
]]>
The evidence element is used to present the evidence
relating to the collation. It may contain either a sequence of paragraph
elements, a discussion of the inscribed marks supporting the formula,
or both, using the following elements:
groups elements providing relating to the collation.
contains a description of collational evidence which takes the form of
inscribed marks. Attributes include:
specifies the form of the marking. Suggested legal values are
evidence provided by catchwordsevidence provided by signatures applied to each leafevidence provided by signatures applied to each quireother form of evidenceindicates whether the markings are present throughout the
manuscript, or only in part of it. Suggested legal values are:all quires (or leaves etc.) bear the specified informationonly some quires (or leaves etc.) bear the specified information specifies the physical placement of the markings on the leaf or
quire. indicates the orientation of a markingmarking is horizontalmarking is to be read vertically upwardsmarking is to be read vertically downwards
In the following example, the only evidence for the quire formula
cited is the presence of one surviving catchword.
a trace of a catchword survives at fol. 127v
]]>
In the following example, more detailed evidence of catchwords is
supplied:
Catchwords are present at the end of all quires except XIV, XVI, XXIV,
and XXVI, written horizontally near the centre of the lower margin, in
the same hand as the main text, usually between two
dots ]]>
These elements are defined as follows
]]>
Script, rubrication, and secundo
folio
The three elements defined in this subsection are used to describe
aspects of the way in which a manuscript is written: the kind of script
used, the presence of any rubrication, and any identification
information provided by the secundo folio.
Script
The script in which a manuscript or ms part is written may be described
using the following elements. Note that the TEI
Guidelines
propose that a definitive list of the identified scripts or
hands used in a manuscript should be supplied as a handList
element within the profileDesc element of a standard TEI
Header. The hand elements defined there do not however permit
of the additional information proposed here; however, to retain
compatibility it is recommended that scriptNote elements
should be linked with a corresponding handelement (using the
hand attribute on the former) wherever possible.contains one or more scriptNote elementscontains a description of the handwriting of the manuscript.
Attributes include supplies the identifier of a hand element elsewhere in
the TEI Header containing further information about the script being
described by this note.
written in a gothic liturgical bookhand in two sizes,
according to liturgical function
]]>
These elements are defined as follows
]]>
Rubrication
The term rubrication is used here both literally, to
refer to text written in red, and more generally to refer to any text
distinguished from the surrounding script by use of colour or other
marks such as paragraph marks, run over symbols etc. A description of
the rubrication practice used in a manuscript or manuscript-part may be
supplied using the following element:describes any rubrics or headings, distinguished
from the surrounding script by the use of colour or other devices
A typical example of the use of this element might be:
headings in red, capitals touched with a yellow
wash
headings, occasional paragraphs and underlinings in red,
capitals touched in red; guides for rubrics often
visible ]]>
This element is defined as follows:
]]>
Secundo folio
In the Middle ages and beyond, a commonly used means of
distinguishing one copy of a text from another was to note the words
beginning at a specific point in the text, generally the start of the
second leaf, since no two handwritten copies of a given text are likely
to have reached exactly the same point in the text after writing both
sides of the first leaf. This practice makes it possible to match
surviving manuscripts in modern libraries with references to them in
medieval inventories and library catalogues.
The following element is provided to enable the recording of
secundo folio: Contains the
secundo folio of a manuscript; i.e. the first word or
words on the second folio. Attributes includecontains an indication of
the context from which the secFol has been taken.The
global range attribute should be used to specify the
actual location of the secundo folio in terms of the
standard foliation used for the manuscript. The locus may of course be
the true second folio of a whole volume, or it may ignore coeval
prefatory material, or other preceding material, or it may take account
of a missing first folio, etc. For example, the following secFol
indicates that the words venientem in appear at
the beginning of what was originally the second folio of the text part
of this manuscript, but which is now the 15th leaf:venientem in]]>
More than one element may be supplied, as in the following example.
Here, the true second leaf (fol. 2r), which falls within added material,
starts te dilecto; the second leaf of the
original manuscript (fol. 5r) falls within a Calendar, and starts
KL Sporkelle; while the second leaf of the main
text of the original manuscript (fol. 18r) starts sijn volc
want:
te dilectoKL Sporkellesijn volc want
]]>
This element is defined as follows
]]>
Provenance information
The
listProvenance element is used to group one or more
provenance elements, usually in chronological order (most
recent last). contains a brief description of some stage in a manuscript's
ownership or history.
A provenance element may contain a short prose note, as in
this example:
Perhaps made for use in Paris, and presumably still
there when bound in the late 16th-cent.; fol. 1 may have been added at
the same time
Alternatively, a
provenance element may contain detailed information about (for
example) the former owner of a manuscript, together with a brief
summary of the evidence for this ascription, as in the following
example:
Rt. Hon. T. R. Buchanan probably by 1874; inscribed by him (?)
in pencil 10. in the top left corner of the upper pastedown;
given to the Bodleian in 1939 by his widow, Mrs. E. O. Buchanan.]]>
A series of detailed provenance elements may be supplied,
as in the following example:
Unidentified 18th/19th-cent. owner: inscribed in black ink
in the top left corner of the upper pastedown No. 12.; the same
hand wrote No. 19. in the same place in London, BL, Egerton MS.
3271 (see 4., below).
M. A. van der Linde, before 1864: Catalogue de la
bibliothéque de M. A. van der Linde ... La vente aura
lieu du 7 au 16 avril 1864 ... à la libraire G. -A. van trigt,
Bruxelles, 1864, lot 202.
Rt. Hon. T. R. Buchanan, probably after 1874, but before
1891 (when it was exhibited at the Burlington Fine Arts Club); given
to the Bodleian by his widow, Mrs. E. O.
Buchanan, in 1941; inscribed in pencil D[onated]. 28.v.1941 with
the present shelfmark on fol. 1r, and with the shelfmark alone on the
front pastedown.
]]>
These elements are defined as follows
]]>
Binding description
The binding element contains a description of the state of
the present and former bindings of a manuscript, including information
about its material, any distinctive marks, and provenance information.
Sewing not visible; tightly rebound over
19th-cent. pasteboards, reusing panels of 16th-cent. brown leather with
gilt tooling à la fanfare, Paris c. 1580-90, the centre of each
cover inlaid with a 17th-cent. oval medallion of red morocco tooled in
gilt (perhaps replacing the identifying mark of a previous owner); the
spine similarly tooled, without raised bands or title-piece; coloured
endbands; the edges of the leaves and boards gilt.Boxed.
]]>
Considerable additional work is needed to specify more detailed
information relating to the components and format of bindings. At
present, this element is defined as follows:
]]>