Sub-Cultures as
Integrative Forces
in East-Central Europe
1900-present
East-Central Europe is a prime example of a region
shaped by ethnic, religious and linguistic diversity. It has also witnessed
some of the most dramatic social and political upheavals in 20th century
history, with results that remain acutely relevant.
This project uses an experimental definition of the
term Ôsub-culturesÕ
to advance research into the formation, definition and contestation of Ôcultural
identityÕ in the region – a subject of continued import in the Humanities
and political discussion alike.
In short: we define Ôsub-culturesÕ not in traditional terms
as (for instance) subaltern or youth groups, but as groups with wider, hybrid
forms of cultural self-expression (linguistic, religious, other practices) and
multiple or simultaneous belonging. As such, they cross over and integrate
ÔmajorityÕ, ÔminorityÕ cultures and Ôethnic groupsÕ.
We will explore this definition through a series of
project-specific, parallel and contrastive case studies spanning 1900-present;
plus a number of international collaborations via seminars, workshops,
conferences and other publications (including the East- and East-Central
European Seminar: programme here).
Our aim is to offer a valuable new way of understanding simultaneous forms of
identification in the region, with relevance within and beyond academic
research.
This website will form a portal for our findings and
events; anyone interested in collaborating or knowing more is welcome to get in
touch and join our mailing list in due course.
Key Questions
1. How do ethno-linguistic and religious groups develop complex, multi-
layered forms of identity?
2. What are the processes of cultural and linguistic interaction within and outside these groups, i.e. between each individual group and the dominant culture; as well as the host state; inside individual groups; and between different minorities?
3. What is the role of history, memory, imagination and
myth in the formation of ethnically multi-layered identity?
4. What is the significance of language in shaping such
identities?
5. What types of multi-layered identification can be
established across different ECE cities and periods, and can these be framed
using Ôsubcultures as integrative forcesÕ?
Primary methodologies
Social anthropology, historical
studies, linguistics, discourse analysis
Project components
Four major,
wholly-funded, parallel research projects:
1.
LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES: LÕVIV/LODZ, c.1900
Dr
Fellerer, a linguist, will study multi-layered
linguistic identities among LÕvivÕs Greek-Catholic
ÔUkrainiansÕ around 1900: how they engaged in complex communicative networks, partly in
Ukrainian, partly in the culturally dominant Polish, and partly in the
Monarchy's quasi-state language, German.
The domain studied will be Ukrainian secondary schools, with sources such as
correspondence with the regional school board, curricula, yearbooks and
directorsÕ reports. He will then explore equally complex linguistic identities
among Ł—dźÕs Polish-Jewish-German workforce
under Russian occupation around 1900. The focus will be on factory and early labour movement records from the textile industry held in
the State Archive in L—dź, e.g. workersÕ
committee meetings, complaint proceedings with patrons, records of industrial
actions. The material will be submitted to historical sociolinguistic study,
asking what patterns of using different languages can tell us about
multilingual identity.
2.
MYTH AND MEMORY: JEWS AND GERMANS, INTERWAR ROMANIA
Dr
Turda, a historian, will explore and compare Jewish
and German subcultural identities in the cities of Cluj and Timişoara during
the interwar period: how these communities related and interacted with the
Romanian nation building project. Specifically, the CI will contrast the manner
in which these German and Jewish subcultures employed memory and myth to
diagnose a perceived sense of alienation; and how their sense of identity was
shaped by the degree of integration and assimilation into their new host
nation-state. Core source material will include hitherto new archival material
held at the National Archives in Cluj and Timişoara.
3.
HISTORICAL DISCOURSES: COMMUNIST SILESIA
The
projectÕs fully-funded D.Phil. (Ph.D.) student will investigate historical
narratives about fused cultural identities in Communist Wroclaw of Lower
Silesia (1956-1980). The post-Stalinist ideological context, less monolithic
than often assumed, produced a variety of identity-building discourses. These
were premised on SilesiaÕs strong sense of regional separateness and its
complicated, nationally highly charged Polish-German-Czech legacy
4.
DISCURISIVE CONSTRUCTIONS: LÕVIV AND WROCLAW to present
Dr
Pyrah, a cultural historian, will investigate Polish
and German subcultural identities in now-Ukrainian LÕviv and now-Polish Wrocław
respectively, using historical and discourse analysis. In both cities these
groups were the culturally and politically dominant majorities before 1945. A
key hypothesis will be that today they exist in the interstices of local and
national identity building projects and resist full assimilation into either.
Questions under scrutiny include: how these groups are framed by civic and
national policies; how they market their own identities locally and within
their ÔhomeÕ national contexts (using civic initiatives or newspapers). Source
material will be drawn from interviews, to include local elites; local
government archival records on minority policy; minority press; websites; records of cultural
initiatives, e.g. festivals.
5. A WIDER COLLABORATIVE
PROGRAMME
In addition,
collaborative workshops, international conferences, and seminars (plus
publications and podcasting)
Project contacts
Drs Jan Fellerer, Robert Pyrah and Marius
Turda
(email
addresses via http://www.ox.ac.uk contact
search)
Please
check back soon for further information and a fuller site
Links
http://www.ahrc.ac.uk - Project sponsor
http://www.mod-langs.ox.ac.uk -
Faculty home, University of Oxford
http://www.cantemir.ox.ac.uk - Project
host and office, University of Oxford