Amides: RCONH
2
Most
Electron Withdrawing |
 |
Least
Electron Withdrawing |
|
Functional Group: X |
Halide |
Alkanoate |
Hydrogen |
Alkyl |
Alkoxy |
Amino |
|
Carbonyl Compound |
Acid
Halide |
Acid
Anhydride |
Aldehyde |
Ketone |
Ester |
Amide |
Most
Electrophilic |
 |
Least
Electrophilic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amides do not react readily with nucleophilic reagents
this is a direct consequence of the low electrophilicity
of the carbonyl carbon centre. This low reactivity arises from the
interaction of the carbonyl carbon centre with the adjacent nitrogen
atom (this in turn in essentially non-basic for the same reason).
The nitrogen centre is sp2 hybridised and as a
consequence, amides prefer planar conformation because the three
p-orbitals of the N, C and O atoms are favourably aligned
to facilitate overlap.
If the amide group is incorporated into a strained
bicyclic system (such as that shown below), then conjugation between
the nitrogen and carbonyl group cannot occur in this case
the amides carbonyl group possesses a reactivity comparable
to the that of ketone systems.
The hydrolysis of amides requires much more vigorous
conditions in comparison to acid chlorides, acid anhydrides and
esters commonly prolonged heating in acidic or basic media
is necessary to achieve effective conversion. Amides can be reduced
using strong metal hydride reagents such as LiAlH4. However,
the rate of reduction is far slower in comparison to esters. The
first stage involves nucleophilic addition to the carbonyl centre
(common with ester reduction) and the tetrahedral intermediate then
decomposes in a different fashion to that observed for esters. Whereas
in the case of ester reduction, decomposition of the tetrahedral
intermediate occurs with cleavage of the backbone, in the case of
the amide adduct, decomposition occurs with carbon-oxygen cleavage
and the original CN backbone is retained. This marked difference
in adduct decomposition arises as a result of the poor leaving group
characteristics of the R2N moiety.
If LiAlH4 reductions are performed at
lower temperatures, then the decomposition rate of the tetrahedral
intermediate will be decreased and aqueous work-up will release
aldehyde derivatives. This approach works efficiently only if the
amide precursor possesses structural features (i.e. strained rings)
that inhibit collapse of the intermediate by preventing electron
release from the nitrogen atom.
In a similar fashion, grignard reagents react with
N,N-disubstituted amides to yield the corresponding
ketones. Organolithium reagents react with N, N-disubstituted
amides to produce tetrahedral intermediates that collapse to produce
ketones. Further reaction between the ketone so produced and the
organolithium reagent serve to produce the tertiary alcohol after
acidic aqueous work-up. However, this route can be overcome if the
adduct is stabilised by chelation.
|