A
career of terror: Sharon's dangerous designs
International
Herald Tribune
5 April 2002
Ariel
Sharon justifies the current Israeli military offensive on the West Bank as a defensive action against
Palestinian terrorism in general and suicide bombers in particular. Terrorism
is the use of violence against civilians for political purposes. It is a
technique of warfare that Sharon has often practised in the course of
his violent and blood-soaked career. In October 1953 Major Sharon led a raid
which reduced the Jordanian village of Qibya to rubble: 45 houses were demolished
and 69 civilians, two thirds of them women and children, were killed. In
September 1982, Defense Minister Sharon had command responsibility for the
horrific massacre perpetrated by Christian militiamen in the Palestinian
refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila. In the last week, it has been on Prime
Minister Sharon's orders that the IDF has been waging against the Palestinian
people a savage war which includes the occupation of cities, the bombardment of
refugee camps, the demolition of houses, attacks on medical facilities, the
rounding up of hundreds of suspects, and summary executions.
The
political objective behind this military escalation is to kill an ever larger
number of Palestinians until they submit. In Sharon's own words: "They must be
beaten. We have to cause them heavy casualties, and then they will know that they
can not keep using terror and win political achievements." Sharon's broader political program is to
sweep away the Oslo accords, to complete the reconquest of
the territories, to topple the Palestinian Authority, to undermine and
humiliate the Palestinian leadership, and to replace Yasser Arafat with a
collaborationist leader. In short, the champion of violent solutions has
unleashed a reign of terror in the territories not simply in order to suppress
Palestinian terror but to arrest the march towards Palestinian self-government,
independence, and statehood. The real agenda behind Sharon's "war on terror" is the old
Likud design of Greater Israel.
As
part of a systematic campaign to demonise the Palestinian Authority, Sharon has tried to portray it as a body that
orchestrates the violence against Israeli civilians. In fact, the PA consists
of a group of moderate members who joined Arafat in renouncing terror and in
opting for the political path to progress. It is a government in the making,
with an annual budget of a billion dollars, charged with providing essential
services to the 3,300,000 inhabitants of the territories. Among its 150,000
employees are not just policemen and security men but civil servants, school
teachers, welfare officers, doctors, and hospital workers. About 1,000,000
Palestinians depend for their livelihood on wages paid by the PA. Dismantling
the PA would lead to chaos, instability, and endemic violence. This would not
serve the interests of Israeli security but it may provide the pretext that Sharon is looking for to reoccupy the West Bank, to continue the process of creeping
annexation, and to 'transfer' some of its inhabitants to the neighbouring Arab
countries.
It
is not peace that Sharon seeks with the Palestinians but their
surrender and expulsion. Oppression and brute force is the only language he
knows. The notions of bargaining, accomodation, and compromise are alien to his
whole way of thinking. For him Palestinian moderation poses a far greater
threat than Palestinian extremism. His response to the signs of moderation
displayed by the PLO in the early 1980s was the invasion of Lebanon. His principal aims were to destroy
the PLO as a military and political force, to break the backbone of Palestinian
nationalism, and to absorb the West
Bank into
Greater Israel. It was a war of deception that ended in disaster. But the
architect of this war seems to have learnt nothing from the mistakes of the
past. Today, as in 1982, Sharon is troubled by the moderation of the
PA because it translates into international sympathy and support. He has even
expressed regret that he did not have Yasser Arafat shot during the siege of Beirut and that he promised the Americans not
to kill him in the current siege of his compound in Ramallah.
The
same urge to dictate and to dominate has moulded Sharon's approach to the neighbouring Arab
states throughout his career. He always beat the drums of war and he never lent
his support to any peace initiative. He actually voted against the peace treaty
with Egypt in 1979.The Saudi peace plan, which was endorsed by the 22 members
of the Arab League at their summit meeting in Beirut last week, offered Israel
peace and normal relations in return for withdrawal from the lands it occupied
in 1967. Predictably, Sharon responded with a declaration of war.
He sent his tanks into the West
Bank not just
to pound the Palestinians into submission but to scupper the Saudi peace plan.
The
Al-Aqsa intifada, which Ariel Sharon triggered by his provocative visit to
Haram al-Sharif on 28 September 2000 has already claimed the lives of over
1,500 people. While visiting the most horrendous suffering upon the Palestinian
people, this savage man of war is also endangering the security of his own
people. He was elected on a ticket of peace with security. How many more lives
will have to be sacrificed before Sharon understands that peace cannot be
imposed, it can only be negotiated, and that without peace there can be no
security?
back