REALISM SCI/006
25/11/99
Boyd,
R "Realism,
Underdetermination and a Causal Theory of
Evidence"
Nous 7 (1973).
“Realism,
Approximate Truth and Philosophical Method” in Papineau.
Boyd,
R, Gasper, P & Trout, JD The
Philosophy of Science (MIT 1991), esp papers by
Boyd,
Laudan, Hacking, Fine, van Fraassen.
Brown,
JR "Smoke
and Mirrors (Routledge 1994)
Fine,A
"Unnatural
Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist
Attachments
to Science" Mind XCV (1986).
"The
Natural Ontological Attitude" in Leplin (1984)
Boyd,
Gasper & Trout (1991), and Papineau (1996)
“Piecemeal
Realism” Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 79-96
The
Shaky Game
Churchland,
PM & Images
of Science (Chicago: Chicago University Press,
Hooker,
C (eds) 1985),
esp papers by Churchland, Ellis, Boyd and also van Fraassen's replies.
Giere,
RN Explaining
Science (Chicago University Press 1988), esp Ch 4,5.
Horwich,
P "Three
Forms of Realism" Synthese 51 (1982).
Jones, R ‘Realism
About What?’ Philosophy of Science 58 (1991), 185-202
Laudan, L "The
Refutation of Convergent Realism" Philosophy of Science 48 (1981),
pp. 19-48. Reprinted in Boyd, Gasper & Trout, and Laudan's Science and
Values and in Papineau
Leplin, J (ed) Realism
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984). See especially papers by
McMullin, Boyd, Fine, Leplin, Laudan).
A
Novel Defence of Scientific Realism
McMullin,
E
"The Goals of Natural Science" in Proceedings of the
American
Philosophical Association 58 (1984).
Miller,
R Fact
and Method
Musgrave, A ‘Noah’s
Ark - Fine for Realism’ Philosophical Quarterly 39 (1989) 383-398. Reprinted in Papineau
Newton-Smith,
WH The
Rationality of Science (London: Routledge, 1981),
esp
Ch 2, 8.
“Modest
Realism” in A Fine and J Leplin (eds.) PSA 1988 2 (1989), 179-189
Putnum, H “Three
Kinds of Scientific Realism” Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1982), 195-200
Salmon et. al. Introdution
to the Philosophy of Science (Prentice Hall
1992),
Ch 3.
Van
Fraassen, B The
Scientific Image (OUP, 1980), esp Ch 1.
Worrall, J “Structural
Realism” Dialectica 43 (1989), 99-124.
Reprinted in Papineau.
Does Realism Have Any Explanatory Power?
What, If Anything, Would Resolve The Issue At Stake
Between The Realist
And The Instrumentalist?
Is Instrumentalism More Plausible For Some Areas Of
Science Than Others?